With multiple candidates for President being of the same LDS faith, it would seem obvious, perhaps even predictable that I would support one of them in their candidacy. True, at one point I would have felt Mitt Romney would be good for the country, but frankly, I don't know how committed he is to doing what he says based on his pseudo-democratic governorship. Jon Huntsman was a decent governor. Not amazing, but not bad. However, it seems as if his run for president has exposed some issues that cause me to give pause on wether or not he is truly conservative as he claims. Or will Jon Huntsman be much like John McCain, a fat-free republican.
So, who then do I feel would work well for this country? Herman Cain. His positions are clear, though occasionally misinterpreted. He is not a politician which makes me feel better about his potential in what I consider to be a corrupted form of capitalism.
He does not support abortion which is nice to see. He wants to fix immigration, not just claim to want to stop it. His flat tax program is probably my favorite program and the main reason I would like to see him get into office. Because of his successes and his failures as a business man, I trust that he will be able to learn from any mistakes that he makes while in office, not continue to pursue failed ideas as has our current president.
In the end I of course would encourage others to at least view his campaign materials, watch some youtube material and understand that he is well spoken, well mannered, but not interested in filling crooked campaign promises to special interests. Our country is currently derailed and I believe Herman Cain can get us back on track.
http://www.hermancain.com
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
I question seriously the change that Herman Cain represents:
ReplyDeleteWill Herman Cain reverse America's non-stop movement toward Collectivism when he has historically proven himself a collectivist? Remember that he supported the TARP bailouts, a.k.a. the trillion dollar fleecing of America.
Will he drastically reduce the size of the bloated tyrannical Federal monstrosity by eliminating entire unConstitutional Agencies? He has not expressed any intent to do so.
Will Cain get rid of the unConstitutional unPatriotic "Patriot Act" that blatantly violates America's founding principles. Cain says that this tyrannical piece of legislation is "90% right on". No way, pal.
Will he drive out his former employers, the private banking Federal Reserve globalists that built the United Nations and are driving America toward one world government tyranny? He has expressed that we don't even need to audit, let alone drive these bloodsucking vampires from our shores. Puh-leeze!
Cain has been actively involved in the North American Competitiveness Council, a think tank for promoting the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Agreement that George Bush signed with Canada and Mexico which gives up America's sovereignty and erases the borders with those countries by establishing the North American Union (NAU) and has also reportedly attended the secretive Bilderberg group meetings.
In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Cain stated that he was pro-2nd Amendment, but that it should be up to the states. What does that mean?
In the final analysis, Herman Cain is clearly a collectivist and a globalist, just like Obama, Bush and the Clintons and these collectivist-globalist politicians are ruining America. I cannot consider him a serious candidate for any office, let alone President of the United States of America.
Interesting. With regards to the Patriot act, do you know what 10% he is not for? Because not all of the Patriot act is unconstitutional. As fas as certain agencies he actually has said that he wants to get rid of the department of education and the EPA. So I am not sure where you are hearing that.
ReplyDeleteEvery current presidential candidate was for the bailouts except perhaps Ron Paul. However, Cain's current position is grossly opposed to it. Perhaps he supported a different TARP plan. Since I am not sure where Cain said he was for the bailouts I have no solid comment, nor do I accept your interpretation of his position till I see proof otherwise.
As far as easing the borders for trade purposes that is truly a capitalist position. It doesn't eliminate country and your position is a scare tactic. If Mexico was a better country with a better economy, then perhaps the people coming here illegally would be drastically reduced thus increasing our effective borders. Secret meetings sounds dramatic and conspiracy theorist to me. People meet all the time to advance agenda's. It only sounds like a negative thing if you disagree with the premise of the meeting. I think opening up trade could help our country have access to greater suppliers. The more suppliers the lower the prices might end up being.
As far as his second amendment thing, he is supporting states rights, a great position to take at this point. A smaller federal government influence is not Obama, its not Bush, and as far as collectivists... what does that even mean to you? If you want what is best for an isolationist America, then you are somewhat of a collectivist, you just have a smaller group that you are speaking of.
Just so I can know... who are you for?
Great! Cain says one thing than says another. It's so hard for me to support his ideas when they keep changing.
ReplyDeleteRight, we should follow who Saul of Tarsus was, not Paul the apostle. After all, he changed. Nice principle to follow.
ReplyDeleteTwo words - Ron Paul. -GWH-
ReplyDeleteStill liking Cain now?
ReplyDeleteAre you referring to the allegations about sexual abuse? No. I don't believe them. CEO's and heads of companies get sued and accused of stuff all the time. He is a real threat in the campaign, which means they are doing what they can to undermine him. So, if that is the issue you are referring to, that does not affect me.
ReplyDelete